Showing posts with label Wal-mart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wal-mart. Show all posts

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Anti-Walmart Sentiment in NYC

The FT has a story in its weekend edition (1-13-06) about the fight against Wal-mart's push to build a supercenter in Brooklyn on a currently empty lot of land. Some of the claims by the protesters and facts regarding the case are interesting to note:

-The leader of most of the protests (Joseph Kizelnik) is the owner of the store that sits next to the empty lot. The store is a discount store and I would assume would probably shut down if Walmart were allowed to compete with it. This might sound bad but the store Kizelnik runs probably employs a lot less people than Walmart would employ if it was allowed to operate in Monsey. Also, I am sure Walmart will save local families a lot more money. Net result - more money for the community.

-Kizelnik claims that Wal-mart "will bring in very low-level people, and if these low-level people come in they are going to follow us to our homes, and ransack our homes." This is pure elitism and racism. Wal-mart might attract low-income shoppers because of its low prices. However, to deny the poor access to cheap goods because Monsey residents are afraid of them is absurd.

-A local legislator highlighted an interesting fact about the community in question:
"Bruce Levine,... a Wal-mart foe, recalls that in those days (the 1950's and 1960's) the main street in the town centre at Spring Valley was the place to go shopping for a suit at Nat Kaplan's, or to EJ Korvette's, the discount store chain that was one of the first to establish a model that was so successfully followed by Sam Walton."
This quote highlights how an economy works. Businesses go out of business. Competition brings better stores to the area which closes down older stores. However, the new stores have better jobs and offer better products. This should not be something we lament, it should be something we enjoy seeing.

-The most entertaining part was when Wal-mart came to town to tell the protesters why they were wrong. However, not many protesters came to listen. They did not want to hear another side of the argument. But, who did show up?
"The event was sparsely attended, attracting a few residents and a couple of businessmen interested in supplying the new store."
-Government officials don't realize what a Wal-mart could do for government such as increases in revenue due to the property taxes a Supercenter would pay.

-The most laughable part of the piece was when the FT discussed the actual protest that occurred recently against the proposed Wal-mart.
"In early December, the UFCW staged what Lipsky says will be the first of a series of public demonstrations against the store - an event which the largest group consisted of union members bussed in from New Jersey."
People should not be afraid of Wal-mart. They supply 1.8 million people with jobs. They save the average American family $2,300 a year due to lower prices. And they are an American success story. A result of freedom and capitalism...

Friday, June 09, 2006

Walmart is better than Welfare

Walmart has been the best thing to happen to low-income families since, well, sliced bread. They provide products at low, low prices that these families would normally not be able to buy or lose a good chunk of their pay check to. How liberals have turned Walmart into an idea that is worse than Satan-Worship I will never know.

Now, Walmart has done it again. They are providing tasty, healthier food to our country's low-income families (yours truly included) at low, low prices. They are doing this by introducing organic food at its stores. The WSJ has a great piece regarding this development. In the piece, Ms. Ward describes how the 'original' ogranic movement is upset that people don't have to spend $10 for a piece of organic lettuce at Whole Foods anymore. They disguise their argument by saying that the organic movement has sold out to big corporations. However, they should rejoice. People are demanding it and therefore big business is responding. If these liberal elites want everyone to live healthy lifestyles then they should support the only portion of society that can deliver organic food to rich and poor alike, big business. Wal-mart's CEO put it best with the following quote that closes Ms. Ward's piece...
"We don't think you should have to have a lot of money to feed your family
organic foods," Wal-Mart's CEO has said. To some, this sounds like a
threat--especially to the ethical eating elites who will have to find new ways
of distinguishing themselves from the hoi polloi--but for most of us it sounds
like good news about better food.